It began with a corpus

When an interpretation hinges on a few lines, readers should be able to find them. That principle shaped DerridAI from its beginnings as a multilingual study of Jacques Derrida.

Project history

  1. The starting point

    A corpus for close reading

    The early corpus preserved details such as edition, page, and translator so researchers could locate a passage. It also tracked quotation and stance to help them interpret it in context.

  2. Beverly and Cambridge · 0.80.x

    Reviewable metadata

    The project moved to a common representation for field assertions. That made it possible to record who or what proposed a value, which evidence supports it, and how a reviewer evaluated it.

  3. September 2026 · cELF 1.0

    A specification others can implement

    cELF describes how to preserve source locations, record revisions, assertions, and evidence across research workflows. DerridAI is its originating reference implementation.

    Learn about cELF
  4. Fall River and Gloucester · 0.81–0.82

    A broader research environment

    Later releases brought together evidence-aware review, configurable pipelines, and portable research-site publication. Researchers could inspect more of the work between source ingestion and a cited answer.

Aaron John Schlosser, PhD

Researcher, software engineer, and author of cELF

Schlosser studied comparative literature at Dartmouth College and earned a doctorate in French language and literature at Yale University. His software career has included engineering in healthcare analytics and technical leadership on voting systems.

Schlosser founded DerridAI and wrote cELF, the specification for recording source passages, metadata assertions, and review decisions.

Research goals

Link claims to passages

Let readers trace a proposition to a precise passage, see whose position it expresses, and judge whether the source supports the interpretation.

Test local models

Compare local models on comparable questions. Measure response time alongside citation accuracy, attribution, coverage, and interpretive value.

Keep data and inference local

Keep models and data under the researcher’s control. Use reproducible checks for source identity and citations, and make model interpretations available for review.

Read the architecture